dc.contributor.author |
ANAE, Melani |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-10-02T22:48:19Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-10-02T22:48:19Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
http://www.addletonacademicpublishers.com/knowledge-cultures |
sm |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://sadil.ws/handle/123456789/4602 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Development of Pacific research guidelines can become unnecessarily cluttered, with
competing, unclear designs, and gaps in the transference of customary knowledge
across space and time. Standard ethics discourse goes some way in coming to know
the bones of the person in a general context, but in relational ethics we are called to put
a'ano (flesh) on the bones of personhood, recognising our commitments to each other in
the humanity of relationships. This article discusses the concrete but subjective
relationship between people at all stages of Pacific research. Relational spaces in a
Pacific experience clarify research praxis. The philosophy of 'teu le va' focuses on
secular and sacred commitments, guiding reciprocal 'acting in' and respect for relational
spaces. Primarily concerned with the theoretical and philosophical nature of teu le va,
this article traces the genealogy of its incorporation in government research guidelines
to show how indigenous Pacific ethics have potential to shape educational research in
New Zealand |
sm |
dc.language.iso |
en |
sm |
dc.publisher |
Addleton Academic Publishers |
sm |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Knowledge Cultures;Vol 4 No. 3 pg.117 |
|
dc.subject |
relational ethics |
sm |
dc.subject |
teu le va |
sm |
dc.subject |
Samoan indigenous philosophy |
sm |
dc.subject |
emancipatory paradigm |
sm |
dc.title |
Teu Le Va: Samoan relational ethics |
sm |
dc.type |
Article |
sm |